Thursday, August 10, 2006

Extra Credit 2

If I had to give any advice for future students, I would definately have to state the obvious... read all the assignments ahead of time. Since this was a summer course, everything went super fast and with all of the different books and poems and stories we had to read, it definitely would have been advantageous to have the reading done ahead of time. This was a very interesting class and most of the material was interesting so it wasn't hard to read. Also, I would suggest not using Wikipedia as a source... :) The papers weren't hard to write, but once again, don't put them off til the last minute.

Wednesday, August 09, 2006

First Extra Credit

I think that everyone should read My Sister's Keeper by Jodi Picoult. The story line is slightly complicated to explain, but I'll try: a girl is born with some crazy rare disease and she has nobody that can donate to her bc nobody matches her so her parents genetically design her a sister to match her. The book is mainly about this sister suing her parents for the right to her own body bc she feels like she only exists to keep her sister alive. The ending is AWESOME, a total surprise. I cried my eyes out and I told all my friends and my mom and my pastor's wife to read it and everyone loved it as much as i did. My mom finished it in a day, she stayed up until 3 AM so she could finish it. I think it's just a great, memorable story that has a very original plot.

Last Extra Credit Post!

My advice to future students of this class would be to be prepared to do a lot of work. The assignments and readings are not necessarily difficult, its just that it can be very time consuming. I took another online class and had 2 jobs so I did not get a lot of sleep this past month trying to keep up with everything. Also, my advice would be to keep up on the readings. Some of the novels were quite lengthy. I think it is also important for students to be open minded about the readings. I know that I would not have chosen any of those novels to read on my own, but for the most part I enjoyed the readings.

Another important thing is to make sure you get all the books at the beginning of the class, the readings come up fast. Once you finish one book it is best to go ahead and get started on the next. One thing I learned to hard way is to make sure you have a stable internet connection when it is class time. I almost had a heart attack when my internet went down right at 2:00 when class was supposed to start.

Overall, I think I got a lot out of this class. I haven't had a literature class in a long time so it was nice to catch up on some reading. Also, I actually liked writing the papers because I could write about what was interesting to me (I am a nerd I guess). Even though the class was a lot of work, it was interesting and I enjoyed it.

Final Extra Credit

My advice to future students in the class is to make sure you keep up on the readings and the posts. If you miss one or get behind on any of the readings, you find yourself unable to add to class discussion and missing one or more posts that relate to a previous post. I'd also say it's good advice to ask questions, because Ms. Fishman does a good job answering them.

The reading is valuable, and paying attention to the reading/watching is very valuable. I found myself getting distracted and more or less skimming sometimes, which lead to me not being able to pick up on certain things other people in the class would pick up on, or I would have difficulty trying to recall what I was looking for when I was using in text quotes.

New students can expect (though I suspect it's slightly slower during a full semester) a full work load. I took this and one other internet course and spent about 75% of my time working for this class. The work isn't necessarily harder than any other class, it just requires a lot of thought and there is always plenty of work to do.

I got the opportunity to read a few very good books that I would not have ordinarily read. Even found a subtitled german flick that I would've never looked into without this class. The opportunity to broaden my horizons and think outside of the box.

To prepare for this class, but all the books as fast as possible and if you can watch the movies ahead of time. Also be prepared to contribute to class discussion and don't be afraid to ask questions. Other than that, hope you are a decently fast reader.

last post!

This one is tricky because i enjoyed a lot of the works we read. I would have to say the one that hit me the most, was the last Atwood novel, The handmaid's tale. I believe i enjoyed it so much because I liked not really understanding what was going on at first. I read it in a day and a half becuase I couldn't put it down. I also found it intrigueing because of the issues with religion and government. So many societies battle between the the two ideas and many other countries put the focus on religion. And why i don't believe that any of htem were as extreme as the story was, it was still moving. The lack of power of women, the loss of importance in marraige, and the way different beliefs were not tolerated was very powerful. I also found it interesting the change of feelings Offred had for her mother throughout the story. She seemed at times to hate and not understand her mothers views and then at times would agreed with her mother. I think this moves me because as I get ready to leave the safety of college, I understand things that my mom has done has been for my own benefit. And i am now thankful for that. Atwood is a wonderful writer and I enjoyed Oryx and Crake very much as well. That one struck me almost as much becuase of the issues of genetic engineering. Seeing the dark side and the dangers made me question my beliefs about the process.

last extra credit

For the future students of English 215, i would say be ready to read. But don't worry, it is almost all enjoyable. Of course you will have one or two pieces your not crazy about but they are all engaging and more pleasure than pain. I was able to read a lot of great books in a short amount of time. I think, however, that I understood these stories very well and was able to look into them with depth. I also have to say that while three papers may seem like a lot, they are enjoyable because of the freedom you have. You are not limited by the teacher's topic, you are only limited by how much you get out of the reading. Also be prepared to actually meet once a week, it can be tricky if you have a lot of other requirements to meet. Expect an interesting class that will teach you a lot of modern literature and make you enjoy reading more. I have already started on a free modern lit book just because I got back into the habit of reading again. Also be prepared to speak about what you think, there is no need to be shy in this class, and your ideas and thoughts on the pieces you discuss are important in your sucess.

Additional Extra Credit

If there's one thing I could advise future students of, it's to come into the class starting with an open mind. Personally, I've never been a real english/literature buff (the reason I put off my soph. lit until senior year) and therefore I went into the class counting down the days until it would end. To my pleasant surprise, I really enjoyed most of the readings and learned a lot from the class interaction. Especially if the student is taking the class in summer, I would also advise to expect a heavy reading load but not to allow the intimidating and time-restricted curriculum to prevent them from enjoying the readings/viewings. One of the most imporant things that I gained from taking this class was a hightened ability to view something from different perspectives. Every writer throughout the class has has had his/her own interesting twist on each story which helps us break the mold. In addition, the most valuable thing for me as far as how the class was laid out were the online class meetings. Seeing some of my classmates opinions on views on issues and situations helped me more to be able to analyze things in a multi-perspective outlook. Finally, the only thing I could think to prepare future students for the class would be to get ahold of the books before hand and start your readings so you dont feel rushed while the class is going on. If I was taking the class during the fall and had the summer to casually read the upcoming texts, I might not have been so stressed to finish some of the readings and maybe even enjoyed the books even more.

final post

i know it was not one of the actual books but i think V for Vendetta touched me the most. looking at some of the things that are happening in society today in the United States i think some changes need to be made. i by no means mean trying to make changes the way V did in the movie but something needs to be done just the same. it seems that moral fiber seems to be lacking in most of our politicians and if the people elected to represent us to the world have no character how can we, the common people, be expected to be any better.

final extra credit

for incoming students in english 215 the most important thing to do is make sure you stay on top of all the reading. make sure you have the reading done at least by the time it is due. if you can get can it done earlier for one book you give yourself a little extra time in the next book if you just cant get into it. also make sure you make your posts on blogger in a timely fashion. and when it comes down to the papers use many examples from the books but also expamples from other books and current events. this makes you think creatively and you come up with better information for your paper.

Last Extra Credit

I personally enjoy English classes, especially more contemporary literature ones. So I think what made this course more enjoyable was going into it knowing that about me. That being said I believe any future students should be prepared to set aside time to read. I know with this class being taught over the summer we had very little time to devote to reading and analyzing. But in a way it helped me get things done. I’m bad about starting a book, getting distracted, and just forgetting to finish it. I think having to read a book within 3-4 days urged me to finish some enjoyable books I would have more than likely neglected. The use of films in this course was also good use of the modern elements of literature, and they helped to offer up a breather from the hours of words I had to push through. Students enjoy watching an occasional movie for class. Students should also expect to relate the real world to these novels and films. His helps solidify the readings and makes writing about them much easier. As far as preparing for this course people should just be aware of the world and the events that are taking place. I found it helpful to talk about the books with friends and family and get some of their responses on the matter. The weblog was also is a good tool for gaining different insights someone else may have. This course was worth the effort and I believe anyone who enjoys reading contemporary writing would enjoy taking it.

Extra, extra credit

Future students should be pleasantly surprised with the readings in this class. I enjoyed all of them and didn't think that any were a real chore. Even if they are like me, and already love to read, I think that they will come away from the class with a new respect for literature and the reasons, beyond enjoyment, that writers write.
My advice to students is to think and analyze while you are reading, and "mark, mark, mark." You won't be able to find it later and you'll waste a lot of time looking for that elusive statement or quote! Also, be sure to keep a running list of works cited.

Last extra credit

After taking this class I would suggest to students who are planning on taking it to stay ahead as much as possible. The days where you have posts due one after another, papers due, and books to be read all within a few days gets overbearing and you get overloaded. I think this could be because the class was in a summer session.
I would suggest though taking the class if you like modern literature. I found the class very interesting because I enjoyed all the books that we read. But as in any class I would suggest not waiting until the last minute to read the books.
I think the class is a good way to get acquainted with an online class and various ways of having an online class with weblogs, online chat sessions and turning in homework via email.

One last extra credit activity

To receive 1 extra percentage point added to your final percentage, Please post your advice to future students in this class, talking about what is valuable, what they can expect, what you got out of it, and how they can prepare. It needs to be posted this by Thursday morning at 6:00 am at the latest. Thank you, and have a wonderful summer.

Tuesday, August 08, 2006

Extra Credit

In my opinion, I think every undergraduate should read the book Where the Sidewalk Ends by Shel Silverstein. This book is a collection of poems and drawings. The drawings are great because they help describe the poems. Silverstein’s poems are witty, well written, and extremely entertaining. Yes, this is said to be a children’s book, but I believe adults can learn from Silverstein’s poems as well. I think as we get older we need to be reminded of where we came from as well as our youth. Also, I think there is much to be learned from children; they view the world much differently than we do and I find it refreshing to steal glimpses of that world. (Can you tell I am an early childhood education major?) I know I find life to be going by at a fast pace so I enjoy moments when I can read Silverstein’s poems and be taken to a simpler time. Most importantly, I like the mini life lessons that can be found within the book; and of course I always love a good laugh. My personal favorite poem is the one in which gives the book its title, “Where the Sidewalk Ends.” Overall, the book Where the Sidewalk Ends has much to offer the undergraduate student.

Last Post!

I think The Handmaid’s Tale spoke to me the most out of all the books we read for this class. I really liked Margaret Atwood’s writing style. I also thought that the story was really interesting. I liked that the book had a good mixture of dialogue and background information. There was not too much detail that I felt overwhelmed. The flashbacks were also affective. I liked how the book was organized into chapters (I am weird it bothers me when long books don’t have chapters). I also felt that the emotion displayed in this book was more realistic than any of the other books we read for this class. Even though it was fiction novel, Offred seemed like a real person with real emotions. I felt like I was able to truly feel sympathetic for her and her situation. I think it was also very affective seeing the story unfold strictly through Offred’s point of view. I almost felt as if I was reading her journal, it was very personal at times and I liked that. Additionally, I liked how there was an element of mystery throughout the story. Atwood didn’t come straight out and tell exactly what had happened to Offred, she gave the reader time to try and figure out the story. I also feel that many women in the world can relate to Offred; maybe they are trapped in a bad situation like Offred’s, or in a bad marriage, or were even kidnapped into a sex slave or prostitution ring. I think that is what spoke to me the most. Even though it was fiction that does not mean that there are not women out there in horrifying situations like Offred’s. Overall, The Handmaid’s Tale was a pretty frightening novel. Even though I was a little scared, I was able to get into the book and enjoy it.

Poet's Post

I enjoyed Robert Frost’s poem Fire & Ice and for many reasons think that
it is a symbol and very accurate of his style as a writer. I enjoy the
pentameter and how it rhymes, I also enjoy the sharp contrasts that are
there between fire and ice. I also like the feeling you get when you are
both hearing and reciting the poem, it is very soothing, but still
startling at times. The message is simple at first because it seems almost
blatantly obvious through the comparison that he makes between fire and
ice, but then you start to ponder if that is all that’s meant. Having read
Frost in the past I am used to the dry, dark nature of many of his poems and
having read this one before enjoy it now because at first at a young age
the topic seemed trivial and not profound, the truth was I just thought
about extreme opposites fire and ice, black and white, now however I think
I see the gray area that is under the initial read of Frost’s poems. I now
have a greater appreciation because he doesn’t use complex phrases to
describe his message, but also makes his poems readable and accessible to
all ages. The relation I feel towards Frost’s poems is one that I am now
familiar with and can continue searching for hidden meaning as I
rediscover how his simple contrasts and imagery are actually symbolic of
deeper meaning.

Last Post

The text that spoke to me the most was Love in the Time of Cholera. It is still fresh in my mind and I guess I am still in that stage after you read a book where you are still contemplating what you thought, what the message was, and what parts you liked/disliked. I guess the concept and struggle of the lost love was very vivid to me in seeing Fermina and Florentino come together and grow apart and watching through them the feeling of this thing that was almost tangible at one time and then just dissolved at another. It is a hard thing thinking about something that was so powerful and a part of you and then questioning where that feeling went? I liked the emotion and thought that both had through their experiences both together and then separate and how they both essentially left imprints on each other that to some extent lasted over time.

E-mailing papers

Hello all,

I got papers, revisions, and extra credit from all of you plus projects from my other class, and as a result, my email box was full for a while (from about 1 am to about 6 am). I've cleared some room, so if you weren't able to get something to me last night, please send again. Thanks.

Final Paper Error

I am unable to email you my paper today for some reason.

---The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ---

Sounds serious, no? Ha well I'll keep checking back to see if there's any change.

extra credit

i think every undergraduate should have to read the Junglebook. the collection of short stories with animals in them as the characters. or if not the whole book then just the story Riki Tiki Tavi. this is a great story for children and an entertaining read for anyone else.
the story show the importance of loyalty to your friends no matter what the costs and just how important animals are in the lives of humans. what undergraduate couldnt use a story meant for children in the middle of a literature class to unwind and just read it for enjoyment.

final paper

i could not email you for some reason but my final paper is posted at http://people.clemson.edu/~crawfoj/timeline.doc please let me know if you have any problems with it working and i will email you all the files.

Extra Credit

I remember reading this book of short stories once. It was for some creative writing class. The book was called Self Help and contained short stories by Lorrie Moore. This book certainly classifies as contemporary. In it are insightful and sometimes comical stories that deal with a variety of issues such as: “A Kid’s Guide to Divorce,” “How to Talk to Your Mother,” and “How to be an Other Woman” (which deals strictly with how to be an adulteress). Lorrie Moore writes in second person, a very interesting tense to use. This sets it apart from any other stories I have ever read. It creates a jarring connection between you and the story. It forces you take on the role of the narrator.

One story begins, “Understand that your cat is a whore and can’t help you.” “How to Be an Other Woman,” starts, "Meet in expensive raincoats on a pea-soupy night. After four movies, three concerts, and two-and-a-half museums, you sleep with him… He tells you his wife's name. It is Patricia… Say: 'Hey. I am a very cool person. I am tough.' Show him your bicep."

This book was a nice diversion from the typical story. I enjoyed it because it was differently written, had a unique view point, and was most importantly SHORT. One could easily read a story in a matter of minutes, and it’s also something you can come back to weeks later, reread, and still enjoy it. I think everyone would enjoy it if only for its crazy subject matter.

Extra Credit

I am torn between two books one is Dr. Seuss Oh the Places You’ll Go because although it is a children’s book it has a very upbeat sort of learn friendly, empowering book about a sort of mentality that the sky is the limit. The book is often introduced to young kids to show and teach them to dream big and think big, but I think as adults a simple approach or reminder that you should still pursue big dreams with childlike innocence is important.
The second selection would be Thomas Friedman’s The World is Flat. This summer I had the opportunity to hear Mr. Friedman speak to a room full of educators and his message is important to our youth especially in higher education to read this book. This book talks about our growing culture and the merging of languages, technology, and communication that is changing our job market, education goals, and many aspects of everyday life. The concept is that the world is shrinking in terms of international relations and that if we (USA) do in fact want to remain the dominant power in many aspects of education and lead the world economically, technologically, etc. we need to pick up the pace and be more competitive. The skills our youth need are changing so are the ways children should be taught so that they remain competitive with other cultures who at a much younger age are learning second, and third languages while increasing skills in math and science. The book essentially makes many predictions about our future and what it will take to be competitive and about a newly forming race of intellectuals with new skills and new ways to obtain those skills. For these reasons I feel it is necessary for our students to realize first what is expected and second what they are up against.

Monday, August 07, 2006

Post #2

Robert Frost is an important author because of the simplicity of his words while at the same time a deeper message. Fire and Ice is a poem that could mean different things to different people. Frost discusses both fire and ice as a means of the end of the world. Frost says that he would choose fire, but that ice would also work. I think ice represents hatred which can really tear people apart. Overall, this is a simple poem that has a great deal of meaning. Also, Robert Frost is one of my favorite authors and I think he writes great poetry that everyone can appreciate.

Extra Credit

Lonesome Dove
Although it is long, it is probably one of the best, if not the best book, I've ever read. In fact, I probably need to read it again, since it's been awhile. I've read a lot of books that make me cry. But, I literally laughed out loud all the way through Lonesome Dove. Larry McMurtry makes the characters and scenes so real, it was like "reading a movie"...and that was long before the movie was made. This is a great book for character study.
(All of my books are packed in anticipation of moving so I can't give examples.)

Post 3

In Cold Blood probably spoke to me the most because Capote did exactly what he intended to do. He wrote a book about four brutal senseless murders. But, by the end of the book, I hardly knew anything of the murder victims, and if the truth is known, I probably didn't care. I felt as sorry for Perry Smith as anyone. The detective, Dewey described his feelings when he witnessed the hanging.
" But Smith, though he was the true murderer, aroused another response, for Perry possessed a quality, the aura of an exiled animal, a creature walking wounded, that the detective could not disregard. He remembered his first meeting with Perry in the interrogation room at Police Headquarters in Las Vegas-the dwarfish boy-man seated in the metal chair, his small booted feet not quite brushing the floor. And when Dewey now opened his eyes, that is what he saw: the same childish feet, tilted, dangling (341.)"
That was the person that Capote characterized through the entire book. That is how an author convinces a reader to have compassion for a murderer, even knowing that what they did was unforgiveable. Capote accomplished it perfectly in In Cold Blood, for me, anyway.

Post 2

I'm not sure why the poem makes the poet important, but from the perspective of the message of the poem The Conqueror Worm and Golf Links seem to have special meaning. The Worm speaks of the ups and downs of life that humans endure only to end in misery and death. I prefer to think there is more to death than misery, or just death, and I hope that my life's stage leaves something for someone else to use. (Like I said earlier, the older I get, the more I think of eternal things.)
The Golf Links just reminds me that I really would rather be sunning in the Dominican Republic than working...

Paper Revised... Couldn't email for some reason

Let me know if you just want me to try to email it to you tomorrow. It wouldn't send for some reason tonight. Sorry!

Lara Gordon
July 23, 2006
Real Life versus Literature

Many people would enjoy achieving an existence that would allow for them to live their life untroubled by every day burdens and responsibilities. Unfortunately most people do not have this luxury. With age come responsibilities, which often occur in the form of maintaining financial and emotional self sufficiency and even securing these comforts for others in your care. In Rabbit, Run by John Updike, Harry Angstrom struggles with the anxieties that come with marriage and children. He wants to be free from his responsibilities and find happiness. Harry, like some others, tries to take the easy way out of his life and leaves his young pregnant wife, Janice, and son, Nelson. Updike takes his audience on Harry’s journey for happiness, which spans from leaving his wife, to unexpectedly finding a new lover named Ruth, who ultimately conceives his child, and then having to go back to deal with the consequences of his actions.

The literary version of a story such as this varies greatly from the spoken version. In real life there would be small details, gossip, a lesson that would take time to figure out and learn from, and the power for the gossiper to attempt to control the way the listener feels for each individual in the story. In literature, there are opportunities for more details, the chance for the writer to give all sides of the story, and often a lesson to be learned. The writer also has the ability to control how the readers feel toward each character.

The details of a story are very important, but there cannot be too many or too few. Updike does a great job with the details of his characters as seen in the first paragraph where Updike describes Harry Angstrom with such detail that it seems like a movie playing in one’s head, “Rabbit Angstrom, coming up the alley in a business suit, stops and watches, though he’s twenty-six and six three. So tall, he seems an unlikely rabbit, but the breadth of white face, the pallor of his blue irises, and a nervous flutter under his brief nose as he stabs a cigarette into his mouth partially explain the nickname, which was given to him when he too was a boy.” In reality, one might suggest the hair color or the size of the man and not go into seemingly irrelevant detail about his nickname.

When describing a place, Updike paints the picture, to make you feel like you are right there in the moment with the characters. One great description is when Harry is climbing the stairs of a mountain. He looks down and, “In the lower part of his vision the stonewalled cliff rises to his feet foreshortened to the narrowness of a knife; in the upper part the hillside slopes down, faint paths revealed and random clearings and the steps they have climbed (Updike 118).” If trying to describe a scene such as this in real life, one might portray the walkway up the mountain as narrow with steps going up. The speaker might give the name and general idea of what the place is while leaving out specifics of its appearance. In a novel, details are very important to help the reader have a clear picture of the story, while describing something in real life does not involve much detail because the listener is just listening for the main points and can stop the speaker at any point to ask questions.

It would be very difficult to tell a real life story, similar to Rabbit, Run. When gossiping about what is going on with a certain couple, the gossiper may only know one side of the story or may not know the full extent of what both people are thinking. Listeners of the gossiper may form wrong information in their minds because they do not know what the involved parties are fully thinking concerning the situation. In literature, writers have the ability to voice to the reader what everyone in the story is thinking. They also have the ability to withhold information that may not be relevant to the story or save the information for later to create suspense. Updike lets us in on most of what each character is thinking. There is a period of time in the story where Janice had originally stopped drinking before the birth of her new baby but then starts drinking again after Harry leaves her for the second time. Through her thoughts, Updike lets the reader know that she is drinking in order to keep from crying. Drowning away her sorrows in alcohol gives her hope that Harry will come back. While drunk, she accidentally drowns her baby. In reality, if a few friends were discussing the news of the death of Janice’s baby, they might say that she was drunk but never add the reasons behind it. Literature must give important details to help its readers fully understand what is going on in the story but also to know the reasons why. In real life, it is important to give details, as even the minimum will do. Unfortunately, there are times when major details are omitted which would help one better understand.

While details are an important part, most readers look for a moral of the story. In literature, there is usually a lesson to be learned; however, there doesn’t have to be. Sometimes it’s easy to recognize what the lesson is, like in Rabbit, Run. Updike uses Coach Tothero to show Harry the lesson he must learn from this part of his life, “Right and wrong aren’t dropped from the sky. We, We make them, Against misery. Invariably, Harry, invariably misery follows their disobedience. Not our own, often at first not our own (Updike 286).” Tothero is trying to point out to Harry that people have different moral standards. Harry broke his own moral standards and has to deal with the consequences of his actions. In real life, it is harder to see the lessons that we should learn. It is helpful when you have someone point it out to you, but it usually takes time to figure out the lessons of life. Literature seems to be easier to analyze than real life when looking for the lessons to be learned, mostly because the reader has access to the whole story and can step back and look at the whole picture. In real life, it is harder to step back and look at the whole picture while also realizing the lesson to be learned.

Authors have a lot of control over their audience. While they can pick different lessons to be learned, they can also pick which character they want the audience to like most or how they want the audience to feel about a certain character. In Rabbit, Run, Updike utilizes his ability to control how his audience perceives his characters by making them feel sympathy, frustration, sorrow, and even anger towards a character. For Harry, Updike makes his audience feel sorry for him at first because his wife is a pregnant alcoholic and a messy one at that. But when he leaves her, the audience feels frustrated with his behavior and the decisions he has made. For example, when Harry decides to go home with Ruth that first night after meeting her, the audience will feel anger towards his actions. The audience feels frustrated that he continuously tries to run back to Ruth every time something goes wrong at the house with Janice.

When first reading the book, Updike makes his audience feel frustrated with Janice, the pregnant wife, because she is such a drunk. But later after Harry has left her, you feel sympathy for her. Later in the story when she starts drinking again and accidentally drowns her baby, the audience feels frustrated again and angered by her lack of responsibility.

Because of the way Harry treats Ruth, the lover, the audience is made to feel sympathy for her. Harry uses her as if she were a “beckon call” type of girl. He says he loves her, but it is not a true love that can last.

As for the boy, Nelson, the audience feels much sorrow for him because of all that he must go through at such a young age (his father leaving, his mother’s alcoholism, and the death of his new baby sister).

In the same way that authors can control the way the audience feels for characters, people in real life can control the way others feel for the people they are talking about. People can exaggerate good things or bad things about people to make the listener feel a certain way about the person being discussed. They can manipulate the story to make it seem as though one person is better than another or deserves more sympathy than another. The way an audience perceives characters can be changed through the use of a few choice words and descriptions.

While there are similarities between literature and telling stories, such as the power to control how the audience will feel for the characters, there are also differences. Examples of this would include the difficulty of a character discovering the lesson to be learned, the different points of view that can be seen or understood, and the amount of detail that can be added.

When discussing stories in real life, it is easy to overlook certain parts of the story or leave them out. Details are never a big part of a story as people normally tell the main points such as what happened and where. Often times the story can be biased or one-sided. The listener can’t get the full story unless they ask the other people involved. There are always lessons to be learned in life, but they can be hard to point out and may take time to figure out. In real life, the story teller always has the capability to use words in such a way to make the listener perceive the characters the way the story teller wants them to.

In literature, the author has a lot more time to put in all that one would normally miss out on in real life. Writers can add all the detail that they would like. They can give complete descriptions of the characters and the places the characters go. They have the opportunity to tell what each character is thinking so that the reader knows and understands all sides of the story. The lesson to be learned, if one exists, can be difficult or easy to pull out, depending on what the writer wants. Finally, the writer has control through the use of words to make the audience feel for and identify with the characters.

John Updike gives great examples of descriptive details while telling the whole story, teaching a lesson, and controlling how the audience perceives the characters of his story. If told in real life, the audience’s thoughts may be controlled but other details could unfortunately be left out. People may not hear of all the grand descriptions of the people and the sights, all the characters points of view, the lesson that Harry learns, nor how Harry ultimately found happiness while maintaining all his responsibilities.

Post 1

I think that Garcia Marquez's method of writing is most like Capote's, though somewhat like Updike's in Rabbit, Run. All three use a lyrical very detailed style of writing. Garcia Marquez's entire book is written almost in the narrative, without much dialogue, again very detailed.
Of all the writings, this was my least favorite. I found the story hard to follow, and the narrative seemed to ramble at times.

Marquez's Message

I think that Marquez's message and the style of the way the book reads and unfold is similar that of Updike's Rabbit Run. Rabbit Run is a cyclic book in that there are many trappings so to speak. Updike uses a common animal and that animal's style of life to illustrate the main character and his habits. Similarly Marquez uses the relationship of the trapped love and the faded love to describe a plague of love that only escapes and is cured through honesty and being true to thyself. Marquez uses the plague Cholera to suggest this idea to the reader. It is then that in both books we as readers can actually anticipate where the book will lead based on previous knowledge about common creatures like a rabbit or an influenza such as the plague.

Response to Brad's post re Goodbye Lenin

I must say that I'm glad that you found the movie, just so I could have a laugh over your post. But, you have a very interesting perspective. Thanks for having me look at it that way.

Extra Credit

5 Posts in a row, a new record! Okay, I'm going to refrain from harping on Oryx and Crake anymore, though I think it would fit the bill perfectly, and suggest something else that every undergradute should have to read.

I think that every undergraduate should be required to read The Fountainhead by Ayn Rand. I had to read it for AP literature in high school, and though it was somewhat of a struggle to get through, I've read it twice more since I've been at college, and I don't pleasure read fiction that often. The main reason I believe every undergraduate should read this novel is for its relatable themes and character developments. One of the major themes that I find extremely useful, which is why I've re-read the book so many times, is the theme of struggle and individuality. I think this is very relatable to any undergraduate of any background as we all experience an immense amount of pressure once we assimilate into college to fit in. When I was a freshman I was smacked with peer pressure from every angle, some of which I gave into and others I did not. The book does a good job of portraying the importance to sticking to your beliefs and values no matter what you face. Howard Roarke, the books protagonist, is constantly faced with financial challenges, harsh criticism, and fierce, though unequal, competition. Roarke stays his course because he knows himself to be a talented architect, though few can see it. Roarke also does everything with a purpose, all of his architecture is simple and based on logic, a factor not shared by his competition. He doesn't let intense emotion cloud his vision of his work, he knows what he's doing and he does it, a trait anyone can appreciate. The entire time I read this novel, I felt so sorry for Roarke and was constantly "fighthing for the little guy". I won't tell how the novel ended to prevent spoilers, but it is true that Roarke sticks to his guns unequivocally throughout the novel, and I greatly respect that.

Paper #1 Revision and Final Paper

Professor Fishman,

I tried emailing you my paper #1 revision a couple of times and each time it was returned with an "over quota" error. I've included links to both my revision as well as my final paper below (Both should be up now) so that I don't have to post the whole thing. Let me know if the links don't work or you want me to resend them via email. Thanks!

http://people.clemson.edu/~bbolton/bboltonrevision.doc

http://people.clemson.edu/~bbolton/bboltonfinal.doc

Goodbye Lenin! FINALLY!

Yeah! So I finally found Goodbye Lenin at Blockbuster in Clemson, and let me say, I'm glad I did. I never thought I could laugh at a subtitled film that I didn't expect to have any comedy in the first place. As far as perspective goes, this film, on the verge of sounding idiotic, a lot of Austin Powers, at least the basic plot of it. It poses and interesting question, and I pondered it myself. What if I went to sleep tonight and woke up tomorrow and America was communist, my family was completely changed, and Junebug was actually good; I wouldn't know what to think! ;-) I think the most important perspective, for me, was seeing the collapse of the Berlin wall through the eyes of someone who actually didn't want it to come down. This poses another interesting point, there are always two sides to every story and not everyone's opinion is correct. For example, I sure many members of the Nazi party believed they were actually doing what was best for the world just as I'm sure that members of Al Qaeda actually believe that their suicide bombings are for the greater good. Obviously this opinion is not shared by the victims of these tragesties and the world as a whole. This goes the same for East Berlin and the other communists nations. Like Alex's mother, I believe that some of them actually appreciated their government (communism after all, could be a good system in some countries if integrated with capitalism and implemented scandal free). While trying to construct a present that is pre-united Germany, Alex even goes as far to say that capitalists are actually fleeing from capitalism in favor of communism. By orchestrating this, Alex is allowed to view the unification from his Mother's eyes as opposed to what the media is telling him everyday and actually gain a sort of nationalistic pride and respect for pre-united Germany.

Disclaimer: I am in no way a communist, I just re-read my post and I come off as the type of person who wears a sickle and hammer t-shirt while listening to my Russian heavy metal on my iPod on my way to class. The example of communism being good I mentioned is what I've studied extensively in international business classes. From a business sense, China has a combination of both capitalism and communism that allows the country to be extremely profitable. Okay, now I feel better, go USA.

Week 5 Post#3

First off, for literature to truly speak out to me, I have to do two things: enjoy it and understand it. For me, Oryx and Crake filled both of the above criteria. One of the main reasons it spoke to me is that it was very shocking, almost an eye opener. Now I may not agree with everything she predicts or share in her utter pecimistic outlook, but I do appreciate being given insight into the "worst case scenario" of things. With all the global warming, ozone depletion, natural resource depletion, and genetic manipulation debates going on daily in the media, you some times become desencetized to it and therefore don't really ponder it too much. Like the phrase that was beaten into us during middle school sex-ed, "it can never happen to me" isn't always the truth. Every generation simply convinces itself that problems are hundreds of years away and by the time we encounter them, technology will have a solution; well Atwood doesn't agree. Though I did find the text, as I stated earlier, a bit over-the-top, I was intrigued about her vision of some of the things that could happen. Finally, the text spoke to me the most because after hearing some her ideas and proposed horror stories of the future, I actually got on the internet and researched a bit to see exactly how acurate she has the possibillity to be (the topic of my final paper). This was the only text that smacked me in the face when I finished it and was slow to put it down, staring out in awe and curiosity; I loved it.

Week 5 Post#2

The only two poets that I recognize from the list are Poe and Frost. When asked, "who is the most important", I'm tempted to answer one of those because they're both widely known famous poets and therefore have had the most impact on the greatest amount of people. Well, I've never really enjoyed Poe's poetry and though I've read a lot of Frost's stuff over the years, I respect his poetry tremendously but he really doesn't have an impact on me. Now not because it was the shortest one (I swear!), I enjoyed "Golf Links" the most out of the 5. The reason being is because it was so short, you were forced to finish it yourself and therefore think abstractly. Another big reason this one spoke to me the most is simply because, unlike most poetry, I actually understood it. I think Cleghorn was brilliant to incorporate subtle political and ethical connotation into a four line poem. Finally, I enjoyed the poem, and therefore believe Cleghorn is the most important, because his poem has substance, it's relatable. When many poets go into lengthy discussions about nature and love, I sometimes get very lost and confused, no offense intended, they're just not for me. Cleghorn, on the other hand, cut out all the over-analytical description and presents us with a bare-boned realistic vision, this is entirely possible. I really enjoyed it.

Week 5 Post # 3

I give a harsh criticism to all books, movies, art, and whatever else may influence me. I simply divide it into two categories, those that change my life and those that do little to alter my view on the matter. I’ve enjoyed all of Professor Fishman’s choices in this summer’s class. Honestly most have been books I would have never touched. The movies I would have definitely rented on my own. But out of all the novels and movies we’ve studied only two have served to go as far as changing my life. V for Vendetta goes into my view as an excellent movie worthy of attention. I remember when I first saw the movie poster and I thought to myself how cheap it could be. Then I saw the trailer and eventually the movie. I was truly impressed, and that is rare for me to say. The movie honestly left me thinking about it for days. Likewise Oryx and Crake influenced me past the time I finished it. Of all the books it was the only one that lingered and, in a way, haunted me. I still find myself thinking it over from time to time. Both these works connected with me and cause me to ask questions about the world around me. I believe the reason I enjoyed them so much was due to their language, style, and visual flare. I like how they did not speak down to me, and how they also forced me to question what was right and wrong. I became captivated by a world that was similar to our own but quite different at the same time. I look forward to this connection, and I’m glad whenever I can find it.

Week 5 Post # 2

I'm not really sure how to prove the author's importance in this, but I'm going to give it a shot.

Poe’s “The Conqueror Worm” is a short poem about the end of humanity. In his poem he addresses universal issues that humanity faces. He makes allusions to death through the use of a maggot, the worm at the end of the poem. Angels watch a play entitled “Man” knowing full-heartedly that it will end in sorrow. At times we feel all alone in this world despite what religion may say of heavenly creatures watching over us. Sometimes it seems as though the only company we keep are our own problems. We all seek some sort of “phantom” or idea only to end up where we once started. Life is a vicious cycle that we have yet to master, and Poe writes to remind us that Death is the only certainty on which we can all rely.

Week #5- Post # 3- yay its the last post!!!

I have two literary works that spoke to me the most in the selection of books we have read for this class. First off Truman Capote's book, In Cold Blood, because I do not like reading books about blood, and killing. But I surprised myself and really did enjoy the book because of the different angle he choose to take in the book. Next time I see a book about a murder or another crime I will not completely write the book off. I think the book was powerful because it showed that criminals are truly real people and have emotions and have lives outside of their crime record.
The second book I enjoyed from the class was Toni Morrison's book, Love. While the book did not impact me as much as In Cold Blood I enjoyed the book because of the multiple viewpoints within the book. The women all had their idea of what was supposed to happen and who Bill Cosey was supposed to love....Even though he was dead and at some points it got comical because I can honestly see a group of women fighting over something this like. I thought this book was very different from all of the others and I think this is why it stood out to be as well.

Extra Credit Post

I think all undergraduate students should have to read JIAO Salinger's Catcher in the Rye. For one the book is on the ALA's list of 100 most Frequently challenged books and I think reading books off the list will show that these books really are not that bad and maybe will encourage people to write books that keep pushing the limits. Many great books are on this list that I feel are not controversial at all to open minded people.
Another reason this book should be read by undergraduate students is because I feel like people make fun of those with psychological problems because they do not know what it is like to live with one. I think that reading Catcher in the Rye helps people see what people who cannot help their state of mind are really like and what they have to deal with on a daily basis.
Finally, its my favorite book and I think that's a pretty good reason :).

Week #5 Post 2

Robert Frost is important to the literary world because his poems are widely known in the non-literature world. I think that his poems are known outside of the literary world because they speak to a wide audience. His poem Fire and Ice shows this. The conflict caused during love is so hot and cold and many people can relate to these emotions. His work is accepted in both worlds which I think is admirable because so many writers who try to write for their audience are c criticized in the literary world and so many writers who write for the critics do not succeed to selling their works to the public. I think Frost successfully "sells" his collections of poems to both worlds.

Extra Credit Post

A poem that I feel every undergraduate should read is Robert Frost's "The Road Not Taken." I first came across this poem around when I was much younger and have always enjoyed it. Though nowdays, more and more students are progressing towards a higher education, I still feel as though "The Road Not Taken" illustrates all facets of college life.
Frost demonstrates the need to persue a path that is not necessarily the one that all others chose. As incoming freshman face the new ideas in college, they will have more choices to make than ever before. The poem goes through the decision making process. Though as one person you are not able to have the best of both worlds all the time and a decision must be made. The poem can be used to describe not following the crowd; doing your own "thing." Everything in college is a choice; choice to attend a university, choice to join Greek life, choice to study this major or that, choice to attend this social gathering or study. The poem does not necessarily debate conforming to general acceptance, but rather considering all paths open to a person and choosing the one that makes that person feel comfortable.
I know that before my entrance into postsecondary education, I was faced with the decision of going the route my friends had gone (most of them to USC), coming to Clemson, or going even further out. Of course I chose Clemson "and that has made all the difference."

Extra Credit Opportunity

Worth up to 2 percentage points added to your final grade.

Without giving away any "spoilers," identify a book, short story, or poem that every undergraduate should read, and explain why (approximately 1 - 2 well developed paragraphs.)

Week 5 Post #1

Marquez’s method of portraying a message is different from the other pieces we have read in this course. There is very little actual dialogue that takes place between the characters which can make the story confusing at times. Also, there is so much detail that you almost get lost in it instead of the story. The details are much more overwhelming than any other piece from the course. However, I think the details by Marquez share characteristics with Capote’s writing; even though they write about completely different topics. In both novels you are seeing the story unfold from many perspectives with many details. In Love in the Time of Cholera, the reader views the story from the eyes of Fermina Daza as well as from Florentin Ariza. In In Cold Blood, the reader views the story from reports, letters, observations, and various points of views from the characters. Marquez’s style in portraying a message has many differences in comparison to other works, but Capote’s style can be viewed as similar on some levels.

Marquez's message vs. Updike

I believe that Marquez and Updike share one distinguishing characteristic in their writing styles, EXTREME detail. For me, the detail almost seems to engulf the novel and take away from the meaning behind the writing; it almost hides what the authors are trying to portray. I do believe that both do a good job of actually placing you in the novel. In doing so, I believe that both authors create the most relatable stories, regardless if they're believeable or not. You develop a more intense association with the characters in the novels and share, to a greater extent, in their experiences throughout the text. I do believe that Updike seems a bit more grounded in his writings where Marquez almost comes off to me as a hopelessly romantic idealist. The both have interestingly dissimiliar views on love. Marquez believes that love is all-powerful, it can rise you up just as easily as it can slam you to the ground. Updike doesn't seem to share in this reverence as love is all but absent in his writings. Surprisingly enough, they both include ironic conotation to their feelings about the characters polygamy. Updike takes the more literal stance as Rabbit's infidelity is against his bonds of marriage and moral and financial responsibilities to his wife, not his love for her. Florentino's polygamy is against his love for Fermina, there is no legal bond. Interestingly enough, he sees himself as monogomous as he claims he is still a virgin, which I take to mean a "virgin of love" because he's never trully loved another, he's just bed. Therefore, I believe that Updike uses sex and Marquez uses love. I believe that both authors, though similiar in writing styles, put an odd twist on their opinions and offer up oposing views of life and love.

Magical Realism

As it seems most of the other people in the class, I couldn't find a literal defintion of the term "magical realisim." I do, however, find the term itself very intriguing and could only derive my own interpretation to what the meaning might be and how it compares/differs to science fiction. To me, magical realism is a realistic occurence that contains some over the top storybook emotion that gives you the feeling as if you're floating or you're, quite literally, reading your life out of a novel. I think that magical realism, unlike the science fiction we've read by Atwood, Asimov, and Heinlein, contains MUCH more human emotion which I consider the realistic foundation. Though the stories written about by the science fiction authors are belieavable the human emotion contained in Marquez's Love in the Time of Cholera is more relatable. As a human being and once adolescent male, I can relate to Florentino's unrequited love for Fermina much more than I can Crake's vision of a perfectly spliced future. I believe the magical aspect comes in with intense description, countless symbols and metaphors, and over-the-top emotion. Florentino's love reminds me a lot of the hopelessly romantic authors back in Shakespeare's time. I believe the comparison of Florentino's love to a actual physical disease such as cholera is the most extreme kind of emotion. That's how magical realism speaks to me, in extremes, over the top emotions such as physical pain from lovesickness. I believe the symbolism of the flowers and Florentino ingesting them to "consume" Fermina creates another sense of "magical realism". In the end, when Florentino has the captain raise the yellow flag of Cholera, it's like a magical scenario of him giving into his love for Fermina and, in a way, putting behind him his extreme infedelity to his passion for her. These symbolisms create a "larger than life" magical feeling, at least to me. I believe that magical realism has much more human emotion to offer than science fiction but also offers more than simply fiction because the "magical" conotation gives writers like Marquez freedom to explore in emotional overindulgences and extreme situations to allow the novel to rise above the monotony of reality while still keeping it realistically grounded.

Week 5 Post #3

I think that if I had to pick which book spoke to me the most it would be a toss up between The Handmaid's Tale and Love in the Time Of Cholera. The way the Atwood referred back to the time that we live in now, speaking so negatively about most of it, made me actually think about everything that goes on right now. She talked about how people sleep around, about our government, about marraige and lots more, but it seems like she has this view that our world is so corrupt that drastic measures need to be taken to correct society. I think the society that she created is even more messed up than the one we live in now. The same goes for her idea of the future in Oryx and Crake. The other book that spoke to me is Love in the Time of Cholera because I love to read about romances and broken hearts. Without trying to sound like a loser, I like to imagine that a man would fall so madly in love with me that he would dedicate his life to trying to win me over. Yes, I wish prince charming existed and yes, I wish that everlasting love was still something that people think and dream about. I didn't really like the fact that Florentino slept around so much but I guess that was his way of dealing with what he couldn't have.

Week 5 Post #2

I found Frost's poem, Fire and Ice, to be quite interesting. His poem addresses the fact that the world will end and that it won't be a happy time. He is debating whether he wants to end in fire or ice, whichever one he thinks might be better. Frost has considered the fact that the world is going to end and I think a lot of people live their lives like the world won't ever end and as if they won't ever have to be responsible for how they lived their lives. What happens after we die and the matter in which the world will come to an end has been a pretty controversial topic, or at least a topic of much discussion, and seeing the thoughts of a pretty dominant poet on this topic is interesting to me.

week 5 post 1

Marquez writing style is most like Morrison and Atwood. All three authors go into a great amout of detail so you can know what it is like to be in the setting with the characters and to know the characters. this makes you feel more apart of the book. they also go into a lot of detail about what is happening so you are clear about the plot line of the story. The message of Marquez's book is most like the message in Love by Toni Morrison. It seems to be an almost "all you need is love" theme. Love in these two books is what holds the plot and characters together.

Sunday, August 06, 2006

Week 5, Post #3

Oryx and Crake honestly spoke to me the most because it was the easist book to read. I could have read it purely for enjoyment without the need for any analysis. I found myself wanting to read the book instead of forcing myself to read it. I also was able to enjoy the ideas Atwood presented in the book. The idea of technology run amock is one that is very intersting to me. Yes, it would be nice to have strange pig-type animals grow new organs for humans and have amazing new advances in medicines and whatnot, but the harness needs to be there to prevent people like Crake from stepping over lines. Oryx and Crake was by far my favorite piece of literature in the class which is why it spoke to me the most.

Week 5, Post #2

Perkins Gilman's "Similar Cases" is an interesting poem because it has to do with evolution. I (and I don't say this often) but actually enjoyed this poem. Gilman's important because the poem represents the negative outlook on evolution. Gilman shows the other side of the evolution debate. It's an interesting outlook, from those who are doing the evolving before they evolve. All poetry is important because it can be just as powerful as a novel and a whole lot shorter. Gilman is important because of her ability to show an idea in an intersting light using poetry.

Week 5, Post #1

Marquez's message is most like Toni Morrison's in Love. Both the books play on the importance of love as a cohesive tactic. Florentino loves Fermina and that is one thing that holds him in place. He stays in the same town and lives always with the Love of Fermina keeping himself in place. In Love, Morrison also showed how the love between Heed and Christine carried through the terrible fights that they had for all of those years only to have them stick together until the end. Both Marquez and Morrison pick similar ideas in conveying their message. Both of them rely heavily on description.

I also find that Marquez and Morrison to be easily compared because I don't find either of the books particularly enjoyable.

Magical Realism

Love in the Time of Cholera is definitely a good example of “magical realism.” The novel displays many details about the setting and the characters that portray the reality of the story. Also, there is a great deal of fantasy depicted throughout the novel. The reckless abandonment of love by Florentino Ariza for Fermina Daza definitely provides elements of fantasy. In the beginning, Florentino Ariza and Fermina Daza exchange love letters of great passion yet they do not even really know each other. They have built one another up in a fantasy in which eventually Fermina Daza realizes is an illusion (Page 102). Florentino Ariza created his own world that revolved around Fermina Daza, and he cannot escape. Mystical elements along with elements of reality are used to create this passionate love story. It almost seems like one long dream that the characters have not woken up from. This magical realism in Love in the Time of Cholera is different from science fiction becuase in science fiction pretty much anything from the imagination can be included in the story. In magical realism, there is a lot of reality but fantasy and magical elements are mixed in. This allows the author to explore dreams the readers may have. Science fiction seems to be much more extreme that magical realism.

magical realism

the realism in Love in the Time of Cholera takes place because of the vivid detail that the author uses to describe everything in the book. From the houses and streets to the surrounding scenery to the love and admiration felt between the characters. all this detail lets the reader get a sense of magical clarity in an otherwise dim world.

Week 4, Post #3

I had to look up the term "magical realism" to actually be able to apply it anywhere. There are a few elements that fall under the literary mode of magical realism. Florentino's undying love for Fermina is one of them. The setting, characters, events are all typical, very real ideas that are easily accepted but the love that Florentino expresses for all those years and his living his life based on the one love is such an over the top almost "magical" thought that is seemingly in the middle of nowhere. Another is the way the story is written as a whole. It goes in and out of different time periods linking the characters to each other as the story progresses and also gives each character a part of the story to demonstrate their own perpsectives on the happenings of the book.
It allows differences than with science fiction because science fiction takes a world and generally shows extremes or experiments with new ideas like technology run wild or aliens and the like. Magical realism uses the real world and gives it a few fantastic elements. Nothing that is overly unbelievable, just a few exaggerations. Again, Florentino's love is the best example it seems, or maybe even Florentino as a whole (he's a joke). It's not unbelievable to be sick from "love" and even the extreme he takes it to can be believed, though I don't think anyone relates extremely closely to him. When he is so proud of himself because he has kept his love secret and not told Cassiani, he seems more dillusional than sweet.

Magical Realism

I have not been able to find a good definition of this literary term-magical realism-apparently no one can describe the true meaning. My own logic tells me that it describes real life to the highest possible, or imaginable (almost dreamlike) degree. Science fiction, on the other hand, may be based on real life, or not, and can contain anything the imagination can conceive.
I think the main difference in Love in the Time of Cholera and science fiction is emotion and feelings. There is true love and emotion in this book, whereas in both Oryx and Crake and The Handmaid's Tale, the result of the planned societies was to remove all emotion. The lack of emotion was supposed to control crime and sexual desire, among other things, but it also makes for a very dull world.

Post #3

Love in the Time of Cholera is about a love that is innocent, and simple, but not exactly lasting. It is more of a feeling of freedom without responsibility or the post honeymoon feeling. Fermina falls for Florentino as her first love she believes as all do that it will last forever and then realizes the initial obsession and attraction isn't at all lasting or will bring her the life she wants. At the request of her father and in quest for a more stable life/love she marries Dr. Urbino, who provides her with a life that is more accustomed to her childhood and that Florentino could not provide. Cholera is a plague and I believe a symbol for the life we become accustomed to like the love Fermina chooses with Dr. Urbina. It is a safe, constant, love, but is plague like because it is not daring, or adventurous just steady until death. One could even argue trapping to an extent and that is similar to the plague. At the end of the book Fermina almost feels the release of her childish, limitless youth and that is her rekindled feeling for Florentino. Magical realism has many characteristics one being sort of making an ordinary subject or setting something symbolistic. The comparison or relationship between the trapped feeling of the disease and the lonely feeling of lost love or missing unclosured love is a universal feeling, but the way the book is written brings the concept out in an original way.

Garcia Marquez's message

Love in the time of Cholera can be compared to Toni Morrison's Love because they have a similar message- love is never ending. In Marquez's book, Love in the Time of Cholera Florentino's love for Fermina lasts years even though for a very long time Fermina wants nothing to do with Florentino. This shows how love is uncontrollable. In Morrison's book, Love, pretty much everyone women in the town is in love with Bill Cosey even after his death. This shows love is never ending because even after he is dead women are fighting over him.
The messages in the two books both deal with how love is never ending even if some uncontrollable force gets in the way of what all the characters in both the books love.

Week 5 Post 1

To me I feel that Marquez, although not necessarily telling a happy story, has a more positive way of getting his message across to his readers. Through the actions of his characters and the voice of the book, he makes us feel that true love is an attainable thing, not just something us girls dream about and see in Disney movies. A lot of the other authors, like Updike and Atwood, seem to have a negative outlook on everything. I feel sad and depressed after reading their books. Reading Rabbit, Run and reading about Rabbit leaving his wife and seeing all the stupid decisions that he makes makes marraige, the kind that endures, seem like a fantasy. The future that Atwood gives us to imagine makes growing older almost scary. To me, the differences I notice between Marquez's writing and Updike's writing are how I feel after I've read the book. Altogether, the general tone of the book doesn't make me feel hopeless like some of the other books we've read.

Magical Realism...

I think that Garcia portrays magical realism through the idea of love. The entire book, well at least what I have read so far, is based on the relationships of Fermina and Dr. Urbino and Fermina and Florentino. Florentino for some reason has a great love for Fermina even after she tells him their love was just an illusion, even after he finds that she married another man. Even on the day of Fermina's husband's funeral Florentino returns to her and professes his love, a love that never died over the years. During their youth he serenaded her with his violin and pursued her through all the obstacles set in front of him, her father being the main obstacle. Dr. Urbino shows as much attention to her as Florentino yet wins her because of his status. He goes to great lengths to win her and even gets the school she was expelled from to reaccept her. The romantic gestures we see in this book seem almost unreal, like things that just don't happen anymore.
Love In the Time Of Cholera seems different than Science Fiction books in that the things we read about in this book, like the romance, the sickness, the wars, all of that seems possible. It all has happened. Yet the things I've read in the science fiction books all seem unrealistic, like they could never happen. Also, this book, even though not a very happy story, never made me feel depressed or sad. The things that these authors imagine could be possible are frightening and make the future scary.

Magical Realism

In Love in the Time of Cholera magical realism is used. While the book is obivously about the past there are some aspects to the book that are a bit odd. For one the book ends while Florentio and Fermina are exiled on a ship because all the ports believe their ship has cholera. The ship has a yellow flag flying because Florentio ordered it to be flown. While it is sweet that Florentio did this in order to spend the rest of his life with Fermina this action is a little much.
Another portion of the book that shows magical realism is the fact that Fermina all of a sudden falls in love with Florentio at the end of the book.

Saturday, August 05, 2006

Goodbye, Lenin (finally)

I think there may have been a few closed-minded perspectives regarding Alex's mother after her heart attack. First, the doctor's just may have been wrong about how feeble she was and that she needed to be kept quiet. she may have needed to regain her health and strength rather than lying around not getting well. Also, I think Alex may have underesitmated her strength of mind and ability to accept the end of their socialist government as she knew it. Beyond that, his dogged determination to keep all the changes a secret from her was sweet. It soon became an obsession and was obviously very unrealistic, but it made the movie interesting, and made me wonder what he would come up with next. His one and only perspective was making his mother happy, by keeping her world the way he thought it should be to keep her happy.

Friday, August 04, 2006

Post 3: Which Novel Spoke to me?

Love in the Time of Cholera spoke to me the most because it was a story of true love and a man waiting paciently for his love and the chance to love. He bettered his place in the world for her. He held onto his love for her, but found a way of dealing with the heart ache so that he could hold onto what he believed in. He never truely loved any other but her. She pushed him away so many times, but he never gave up. He kept the promises he made to her no matter how many times she tried to reject them. This spoke to me because it is a story I can relate to... my dad fought for my mom. He didn't have to wait as long as Florentine did but he got her away from her fiance and captured her heart. He had faith in their love just as Florentine had faith in his and Fermina's love.

Post 1: Marquez to Updike

Marquez's Love in the Time of Cholera and Updike's Rabbit Run are very similar in the way they portray their message. They both portray the lesson that they want their audience to learn through a story about peoples lives and how they live them. The audience has to search for the message that the author wants them to take from the novel.

Post 3: Magical Realism

Love in the Time of Cholera is a great example of magical realism. It shows how one can truely love one person and never fully give their love to another even though they may have sex which is often a sign of love. Florentino falls in love with Fermina at a young age, but she does not return his love in the way she once thought that she did. Through her rebellious stage with her father, she fabricates a love for Florentino. After maturing she realizes that the love was never there and moves on. She eventually marries Dr. Urbino for his money and power, but never forgets Florentino. Florentino lives his life always thinking of his Fermina. He was going to keep his virginity for her, but after losing it to another he realized he could keep his love for Fermina and protect his heart from feeling the pain of losing her by having sex with others.

This is different from Science Fiction because it is not something that is of the future. It is a thing of the past. An event that has been proven to have happened. Science fiction deals with future and imagination.Writers must create a world that is believable for the reader, but is also different from the world we live in today. Science Fiction must have some sort of element to the story that could be unbelievable, except that it becomes believable because of the way that the author wrote the story.

While magical realism is making something common become unreal, Science fiction is the creation of something that our world does not know of now. It is similar to an hypethesis of what is to come.

Post #2

The future and the unknown is a scary thing much like the weather completely unpredictable. Although with the upcoming technology being both dangerous and unpredictable, ignorance can be bliss, but still the future is often talked about. The future is planned for, but is also a curious topic that comes up because it is so anticipated. Each science fiction author creates and predicts the probable and then hypothetical to create technology that could be helpful for the future. Asimov, Heinlein, and McTeigue all have different views of the future and cause us to think and reflect about it in many ways. In “All you Zombies” Heinlein shows both the fantasy of desires that could happen with the invention of a time machine, but then also sort of like playing with fire how too much of a good thing can go horribly wrong. Asimov shows a similar concept, but the machine he contemplates is the robot and the thought that besides human emotion a robot could essentially replace human jobs and be more efficient in the workplace possibly accounting for fewer jobs to the masses or middle class. In essence both Asimov and Heinlein show how much technology could benefit and alter our world, but also not necessarily advise, but foreshadow that too much dependence on science could be deadly. The same thing in a way has already happened with our dependence with computers in our daily lives they are replacing new mediums and taking over as communications and reference experts. McTeague’s vision in “V for Vendetta” is the scariest to me. I think that more likely than humans relying on robots or time travel would be totalitarianism. If the vision for the future is seen by the elite it seems our culture as we know it could fall to such hands. This at times in the past has already happened and so I don’t think this is so far off, with all these mega businesses like Disney or Microsoft constantly buying all name brands and coining their contracts to encompass their work ethic a lot of stores, power, and the people that work/shop there are in the hands of a few. Other gateways such as international trade and power, plus the world getting flatter so to speak could also cause this to happen. I think that all these science fiction thrillers should in a way be encouraged on our children’s youth because although other traditional reads teach valuable lessons on right and wrong, these are the future and cause children to think about technology, math, science and the realm of many possibilities.

Thursday, August 03, 2006

Post 2

The controlling society in The Handmaid's Tale reminds me of a Communist society where everything is determined by the government and traitor's are killed. I remember hearing and reading about how the "brightest and best" in academics or sports in the communist countries were paired and married to foster a more perfect society through the children they would have. Not that far off from this book, although not quite as controlled. The treatment of women also compares to the total lack of regard that most Islamic countries have for women, except as a symbol of ownership with no mind of their own, or no reason to think for themselves.
If R&D continues at the rate that it is going, I could easily see societies being segregated, divided, protected, and maybe even destroyed as it was in Oryx and Crake, although I'm still a little leary of the Crakers.
I'm not at all convinced of time travel as in All you Zombies or robots who can actually reason as in Robot Dreams. Neither of these seem likely as a future achievement, although that is what was once said about cloning, too.

Post 1

Studying literature helps us learn how to learn. Most authors have an underlying message when writing, even when writing novels for our reading pleasure. Sometimes these messages are not as obvious as other times and we have to learn how to look for the "message." It may be a lesson of life, a forewarning of the future, a history lesson, or just the author's opinion or viewpoint of a situation. But, in order to understand it, we have to first learn how to comprehend it.

Post #2

A common fear for the future is loss of freedoms. In The Handmaid’s Tale, Atwood depicts a life void of many freedoms. Women are extremely restricted in their rights. The Handmaids are pretty much only used for breeding purposes and they are strictly monitored. The Eyes are always on the look out for anyone who is committing “heresy.” The fear of loss of freedoms in the future is also revealed in V for Vendetta. This view of the future was disturbing. The government had become extremely controlling by monitoring conversations and telephone calls as well as enforcing an 11:00pm curfew. In Robot Dreams, by Isaac Asimov, the view of the future also shows a fear for the loss of freedom. However, this story was different from the other ones mentioned. The fact that a robot had a dream like a human meant that something about the robots was changing. The robot that dreamed revealed his dream as well as that he did not have to follow the 3 laws that all the other robots were bound to. This created a fear in the scientists that perhaps other robots may no longer have to follow the 3 laws. Overall, these three authors depicted a fear of the loss of freedom. I think they also fear living in fear. People reading these stories today are hoping that they never see a world in fear of such things. I know I would be horrified to live the life of Offred in The Handmaid’s Tale.

Week 4, Post #2

Atwood's future in "Oryx and Crake" is somewhat likely to happen, though not necessarily to the extreme she shows. Personally I found the life they lead in "Oryx and Crake" before the epidemic to be interesting though scary. It does sort of show the way medicines and things are now and how people go to GNC and buy all sorts of vitamins and supplements and do not always know what they are taking. "Oryx and Crake" just takes it to an extreme, but it could happen.

"V for Vendetta" is another future that is not too far from present. The idea of being completely watched over by a government complete with total propaganda-ridden news and zero tolerence has been seen in governments already. Though it would not seem likely that a regime like the one operating over Britain in the movie would come to pass, there have been large political changes in the past.

"Robot Dreams" by Isaac Asimov was interesting in that robots had become prevalent to the point of being able to function almost as humans. I do not specifically know the recent advancements in robotics but I can only imagine the difficulty acheiving something like in "Robot Dreams. " The fear Asimov expressed was that the ability of a robot to think and dream outside of rules instated in its mind is almost like creating life. Creating a robot that is stronger and faster than a human and that is able to think for itself would allow it to fight and/or kill humans. Let's hope that doesn't happen.

Post 2: (Poets)

In “Fire and Ice” by Robert Frost, Frost chooses that the world end by fire, but then he goes back to say that if the world were to be destroyed twice, then ice could do as well. Fire destroys everything in its path. Ice can destroy and break objects in nature, but ice can also melt away and those that were once frozen can come to life again. He compares desire with fire as if it were like passion… the desire to fully destroy. He compares ice with hate. Hate can be forgiven, and ice can melt away. Robert Frost is an important author because he shows the relation to the end of the world as a passion to destroy it but also how the hate can be forgiven and the world while being destroyed can also be set free.

Post: 2

Robert Heinlein, Isaac Asimov, and Arthur Clarke all tell stories of the future. They each create their own world, that is similar to our own but with extra machinery that could help our world, but also completely damage all that we, as humans, believe is good. In “All You Zombies,” Heinlein shows fear of how a time machine can be a bad thing. People can easily hop from one time in a person’s life to the next, potentially missing out on most of their own lives because of all their time travel. Asimov shows how robots, while being helpful by doing everyday chores, could potentially be the end of the human race if made to be too smart, in his short story “Robot Dreams.” Clarke tells a story of the end of the world coming because monks discover “The Nine Billion Names of God.” In all these stories, time machines, robots, and research machines are feared because of what terror they could bring to human lives.

Post # 2- Science Fiction

Atwood's vision of the future scares me the most. Probally because of the treatment of women throughout the book as sex slaves and having the job of only bearing children for the men. Offred's life is really sad because she is not allowed to see her daughter and she is forced into a life that she does not like and gets punished for things she can not help. This view of the future could possibly happen but I am not sure that it would happen here in America

In Oryx and Crake Atwood's vision of the futre is probally the most and least realistic at the same time. I feel like the end of the human kind will be in some way human kinds own fault but I do not think that what will take over the world is our own creations (pigoons and whatnot). But the earth will convert back to what it was like before their were humans to destroy the earth.

V for Vendetta, I believe is what will more than likely happen for the future. Because a lot of it has already happened somewhere in the world. "The Big Brother" civilization have pretty much already happened in some part of the world so if somewhere in the world a "Big Brother" starts to take over this is very possible to happen. I think with laws coming into effect in America the government is getting closer and closer to this especially after nine- eleven.

Post # 2

If it’s one thing about the future that we know it is that we constantly think of it and imagine what will come from it. This reason alone speaks so strongly why science fiction spans so much literary territory.

All the authors we’ve read give a glimpse at a possible future. In each story we see what could be the end of humanity as we know it. Sometimes it’s the end of the world; sometimes it’s a switch from one reality to another. In each case there is some frightful truth to the world that comes to be.

In a way, technology is the device by which we expose our own frailties, and it eventually leads to our downfall. Each author we’ve read shows this. Clark shows that, thanks to the wonders of technology, we are able to do a job faster, more accurate, and more reliable than human minds could normally accomplish. We’re all using computers these days. 20 years ago it would have been science fiction to believe every household would hold a computer and that students could meet for class through an online network. Asimov and Atwood both show the advancement of humanity into the realm of a god-like creator, capable of remaking the idea of consciousness and life through the tool of technology. Robots are being developed to travel the surface of Mars, perform surgery, and aide the disabled. Genetic manipulation can help treat diseases and we are developing ways to grow body parts for surgery. All of these stories serve as a warning to what could be in possible hopes that they never come to be.

week 4 post2

in the majority of the science fiction we have read the human race seems to regress instead of making progress. In V for Vendetta the we have lost the freedom that people have fought centuries to get. we can no longer enjoy the arts, whether it be books, tv, movies or artwork. In Atwood's A Handmaid's Tale the women a sacred but they have lost all of their rights, it is no better than in the early 1900s when women were nothing more than birthing vessels that also took care of the house. In the Asimov story we have fallen back into slavery but it is no longer humans that are enslaved. the robots are shown to have thoughts and feelings and we use them as slaves, just the same as there were slaves in the south in the 1800s. science fiction is offering us a picture of a very bleak future filled with fear and injustice. we can only hope take note of these stories and make sure nothing like this really happens to us.

Post 4... late

In Oryx and Crake it seems like nothing is impossible. If it can be imagined, it can be made a reality. With all the advances in science that are evident in this book, it seems as if men have crossed every obstacle that we have these days. It's kind of scary to see what they have done in this book. I think there is so far that we should go with science, past that point, we are trying to play God and that's not right. All You Zombies is a pretty wierd story, it is definitely interesting and caught my attention. It doesn't really make sense to me at all. Science fiction seems to me a manifestation of people's want to be able to push the envelope of what we can or have accomplished up to today. Anything they can imagine or want to happen in the future is put into writing and now we read it and contemplate the possibilities of it happening. That seems the whole point of science fiction to me.

Post #2

Atwood has a good way of making the future seem scary. In Oryx and Crake she shows us a world completely changed from the world we live in today that is completely changed by science. Nothing about the lives that these characters lives in seems pleasing. Much like in Oryx and Crake, the lives of the characters in The Handmaid's Tale seem horrible. Everything about that book is odd. Just the thought that society could end up that way is scary. I'm still not exactly sure how or why things ended up that way in The Handmaid's Tale, but I think if I knew I might be able to understand the book a lot better. It's kind of ironic, the way she describes our lifestyle today makes us seem like the bad generation, the one that we should be scared to live in, yet when I read this book, it is completely opposite; I would hate to live in the world she has created for the future. It's seems as if people have completely lost their freedom. In both of Atwood's books it seems like she doesn't have a positive outlook for the future, like she is convinced things are going to get worse over time.
All You Zombies was very wierd. I had to read it a few times over just so I could grasp what was happening. Im not sure what this author envisions of the future, but if the future is anywhere near as confusing as this story was, Im in for some trouble.
I don't think that the future will be like any of these stories. Yes, I think that science will progress greatly, but not to the point that we are mixing breeds of animals or inventing diseases. I don't think we will have a society that is based around scientific research like the society in Oryx and Crake. I also don't think that women will end up being used as vessels for birthing and nothing else like in The Handmaid's Tale. I pretty much think the idea of time travel is ridiculous, as interesting as it is I don't see how it's possible, so I don't really expect time travel in the future.

Science Fiction Post #2

In all the science fiction that we've read in this class thus far, every author seems to portray one common emotion; fear. Every author seems to be pecimistic to a degree offering up a "worst case scenario" of what may come to pass. In addition, all the stories agree that the problematic future we are set to inherit is created by mankind and the actions they've taken; it is our own fault. Most likely the most pecimistic, yet most talented, author would have to be Atwood. In both of her novels, she describes a new world completely different from the one we know, entirely at the fault of mankind. In both her novels, pornography and leud conduct seem to be a forewarning of a cataclismic (sp?) event that destroys society. Whether it be genetic mutation gone wrong or chemical spills and governmental overthrow, they both change how the world lives for the worse. Life becomes much more controlled and monitored in attempts to create a more efficient society, especially in Handmaid's Tale. The future foretold in Oryx & Crake is much like the one predicted in "Robot Dreams"; scientific advancement escapes the control of the scientists and becomes a self-operating entitiy, like the genetic mutation and the dreaming robot. Handmaid's Tale and V for Vendetta also share eeire similarities as the world we live in now is replaced by totalatarian governments who control and censor anything that would make the government seem out of control. One thing is true in all of these texts; whatever terrible future we create is a direct spawn of fields that are supposed to be helping us, government and science. Mankinds obsession with technological advancement seems to reach the spillover point where it can only come crashing to the ground. Out of all these futures, I believe the future fortold in Oryx and Crake is the most frightening and believable. With all the controversy with stem-cell research and genetic mutation coupled with the global warming fear, it seems that humanity has the potential to destroy itself in efforts to create greater convenience. I believe that totalitarian governmental overthrow, though possible, is less likely and would create a less disasterous future than the self-destruction foretold in Oryx & Crake.

Tuesday, August 01, 2006

Why study Lit??

Well, as much as I hate studying literature, I think that it is important to study it because most authors have something they want to teach us or something that we want to take from it. Also we learn from the past. Literature from our past and the past of our ancestors has something to teach us weither it is to show us how to write a poem, how to feel inside, or something to teach us about life, love, and happieness.

Final Paper

I am still unsure about what I want to do for my final paper. It will depend on how I did on the second paper. I am trying to think of some different creative ways to answer the big question, but I will probably stick with writting the paper even though I hate writting 8 page papers because they end up being filled with mostly "bs," and when in the real world, employers want things straight and to the point... meaning no "bs."

Final Paper Idea

Uh, it’s been a LONG past two days. I finally have a computer that works now. Anyway, for the time being I’m going to say I want to center my paper around the comparison of modern literature to visual and performance art keeping mainly in the context of the past versus the present and speculations on future (e.g. Michelangelo to Mondrian and Hamlet to modern theatrics like The Vagina Monolouges). I see how a lot of liberation came about for each of the visual and performing arts after time passed and I can see the same happening for literature.

Final Paper

I plan to analyze the fictional and realistic components of Oryx and Crake and how likely Atwood's future is given the way our society is living and treating the world. In particular, I want to discuss the benefits and dangers of genetic splicing and how likely that, as in the case of Crake's experiements, genetic manipulation can go wrong enough to cause a catastrophic event. I also plant to touch on the realistic descriptions of how Atwood describes the way humans affect the environment, whether or not it leads to as depressing of a world she desscribes.
I am having a lot of trouble getting into the discussion. I've tried a few times but it won't let me in

Why do we study literature?

This is an interesting question, and I think it's important to consider that it is a general educational requirement here at clemson; everyone regardless of major has to take it. I think this means that anyone of any field of study can benefit with having a basic understanding of literature. I think that at the very least, literature is a way of expanding your mind. The fact that it's not definative, there is no right/wrong answer, allows a creativity not allowed by many other subjects. I think, most importantly, that by reading literature (however much I may fight with it!) can benefit everyone by increasing spacial creativity and expanding your vocabulary. I think another important thing that literature teaches us is that it can show us different sides and viewpoints of a certain thing we may not have thought about first off. It's interesting to learn about deeper meaning and explore characters and actions beyond the surface to expose the underlying symbolisms and themes. By doing this, you can apply this angle of interpretation on much more than simply literature, you can analyze life and the world beyond the basics.
Literature is studied for a variety of reasons to explore past worlds and everyday concepts learning/relating to characters that we see parts of ourselves and our friends/families in. Today literature explains and reads so differently, but the message is often the same. Althought technology for the most part has changed many aspects of everday life and events it hasn't changed the value or quality of life. Authors stretch to merge with the times and present fresh ways to teach old lessons.

Final

For my final I have been pondering what would be interesting to compare and have decided to talk about all the different concepts of modern literature in respect to the texts we have read. I will try to prove big terms that are associated with modern lit. using examples from the text. My overall goal is to show that there are increasingly more genres classified because of modern lit. and that althought some of the same themes are around that were in the past writers have attempted to add something or a new style of looking at an old concept. Modern lit. writers have become increasingly more racy and although the same issues for the most are around today the amount of detail acceptable to be published (Love) is more varied. I will show how modern lit. challenges and talks about either new topics in our world, or revisits older times, but reads in a modern way (Capote).
I have a mixed view of science fiction. On the one hand I enjoy it for its creativity and modern topics, but I also tend to associate it with sort of a dark side/humor. Science fiction reads to me with a very modern, trendy feel much like a lot of tv shows (24, CSI) do today. Science fiction is also very popular among today's youth with any form of entertainment. The first memory I have of science fiction is from the Sci-fi channel. The movie was about an earwig that ate through a man's brain to the other side. After surviving this the man then learned that the earwig was pregnant and had in fact laid eggs inside his brain. I do enjoy how science fiction explores the unknown: space, the depths of the ocean. Science fiction asks you to escape to worlds that are imaginable, but either before their time or impossible. I liked Oryx and Crake because it involved the future and concepts that are easy to imagine and forces you to not so much focus on the probability of the future, but how science and technology could simplify and enhance the world. Not only do I think that the way a science fiction creates solutions to the future, but also enjoy it for the way it incorporates the changing technology and scientific concepts and studies that shape our policy, government, and a variety of current events in the future. In many ways it evolves and creates works based off of current space travel, genetic studies, etc. and takes those realities to the next level that sometimes eventually come true.